PS: for those that aren't too familiar with how long a wormhole lasts that's a new nullsec system each day MINIMUM. Seriously, the wormhole I live in has a nullsec static, and we haven't gotten a populated system in over a MONTH. Even worse when you find out the other half of the galaxy is empty. When you have to jump halfway across the galaxy to find a fight, something is wrong. Large regions of blues creates stagnant and boring conditions!!! I certainly don't want CCP to enforce that playstyle. The best small-to-medium scale PvP happens when you have a dense population, with lots of targets in every direction. They need to solidify non-invasion pacts, where you blue up with your neighbor only to defend against Sov invasions, but shoot each other the rest of the time. People blue up entire sectors of the map, and then complain about the lack of PvP. No offense, but coalitions are destroying the game. I haven't seen this proposed before, so what do you guys think? Any thoughts or suggestions to add are welcome! Once a Coalition is formed, All member alliances would share bookmarks, POS and JB passwords, and a new option on the starmap to show Coalition wide space and JB routes. If you don't want to fight, then leave your Alliance. Corporations would not be given a choice. Alliances would obviously have to be accepted into the Coalition and would be given the option to bow out of a coalition if they choose within 24 hours of a coalition war dec with no penalty in game other than political ramifications in the metagame. There would not be a "Leader" position for the Coalition, all top teir personnel would be equal as no Alliance information that isn't already available would be seen or be able to be changed by anyone not in an Alliance.
The executors of two alliances would be required to form a Coalition, costing 10 billion isk, and an additional 5 billion for each additional alliance that joins the Coalition, with a 50 million/month upkeep fee. No changes to tags, and no limit to the number of alliances that would be allowed in the Coalition. Alliances and Corporations would still maintain autonomy and still have to fund their own part of the war. The recent addition of War Tracking can still be confusing at a glance, seeing who's winning, who is on who's side, and by legitimizing Coalitions, a lot of the clutter can be cleaned up to show a better overall glance of how wars are progressing. This would be for the soul purpose of easing logistic worries and allow for a better top down view for war efforts. No one Corp or Alliance can be on 23/7 to defend, attack, scout, spy, refuel, set timers and all the other great wonderful things that don't go "boom" Proposal I propose an in game legitimacy of these Coalitions by having Top Teir (Directors, CEOs) level chats and sharing of standings, as well as POS and JB access coalition wide. these groups of Alliances band together for a single purpose, usually for war.
0 kommentar(er)
